Debra Sue Rand alleges that she's a lawyer. When one sees "sue" as part of a supposed attorney's name, one's got to wonder if it's purely coincidental. Debra Sue Rand further alleges that she's employed by Pennsylvania's villainous and falsely named Department of "Corrections." (It has nothing to do with "correction," only with imprisonment.) Department of Imprisonment lawyers have a generally VERY BAD reputation. Like other prison functionaries many seem to be drunks and simply incompetent drones. They're the only gang of state lawyers dedicated to working against the interests and wellbeing of us citizens. Ms Debra Sue alleges that she has the unenviable chore of defending Michale J. Conti, the prison guard who likes to watch me shit, an odd fellow we had to sue. Attorney Sue seems to have little or no influence with her client, Ringtown Mike. After my suit was filed, I had to write to her that he was still continuing to harass and threaten me and now, threaten my wife, Sandra, as well. If she took the time to advise Mike that he ought to stop his threats, there was no sign of a change. Within a day of so, the guard was stalking me. He was at my door calling me "turd!" The poor fellow seems to have an unhealthy obsession with shit. To me, it seems an odd taste. I think I'll ask the court to order a psychological examination. I've already proposed polygraph examinations for both of us. Mike's a liar. A polygraph would likely resolve my claims. It might not be a bad idea for the Department of Imprisonment to carefully investigate his employment application. What went on in Philadelphia (if anything)? In fairness to Debra Sue, I must mention that she alleges that she phoned a so-called unit manager. Who knows why. He has no connection with the case or our claims. Sue said that the unit manager (they're an idle and useless class of overpaid bureaucrats) supposedly said that I should take care of Conti's conduct myself. Department of Imprisonment executives habitually shirk their duties. They expect others to do their jobs for them. We haven't as yet gotten the report on how much we taxpayers pay Ms Rand for her invaluable service of defending a toilet spectator. She shouldn't have to do much; manipulating the law, rules and facts is a fairly well established substitute for truth and justice. Why not simply tell the the potty prowler to behave lawfully, or, even, agree to lie-detector tests? Rebecca's Bargain Antiques Collectible Vintage Photos Fine Prints - Old Maps Sheet Music - Old Books Elegant Antiques and Collectibles "Lawyers, I suppose, were children once," Charles Lamb, 1816 You are welcome to use or republish any of our material. Please give www.prisoners.com credit as the source. Return to the George Feigley versus Michael Conti Return to the Lawyers, Sharks and Saviors Menu. Return to the Main Menu. Go to our site's Search Engine. Send us Your Comments, Questions or Input.